Draazen (2015-06-29 16:45:05)

---

Well? I actually got it and its pretty freaking cool. I beat it in like 6 days. It is a 12 hour long game though. Also Arkahm Knight is JASON TODD. I spoiled it because I'm an asshole. JASON TODD is the red hood BTW.

---

BirdJesus (2015-06-29 18:14:31)

---

What?

---

Ron1212 (2015-06-30 01:30:43)

---

Just wanted to say, you're a ty person for spoiling it.

---

JaronTheFireCat (2015-06-30 01:58:36)

---

Great job on making an interesting thread.

---

pikarceus (2015-06-30 05:31:43)

---

See my sig. Honestly the game makes it suuuper obviously who arkham knight is. Great game, just hate some of the forced batmobile stuff and why no real boss fights? I think City remains the most "perfect" Batman game as it was pretty much flawless. This game looks and plays better but some of the batmobile stuff ugh. It's amazing in free roam and messing around but there was one part in the story that almost made me chuck my remote. Witcher 3 is still goty, imo. But this game definitely has set a new technical benchmark on the PS4 that won't be surpassed for at least at few months. Won't say anything about that awful PC version.

---

Ron1212 (2015-06-30 22:07:05)

---

^Reply to my PM bro

---

Shane (2015-07-02 22:38:17)

---

I bet it's fun on PC. Hahaha no the frame rates in the game are worse than the CGI from the Phantom Menace.

---

Spade (2015-07-12 20:34:51)

---

Arkham Knight's good.. I'll just put it that way.
My personal review of the console version:
Pros
-Awesome new combat enemies and upgrades
-Gotham looks fantastic
-Map size
-Dual Play mode
Cons..
-The endings and having to 100% the game to see the credits
-The Arkham Knight was sooo obvious
-Bat-Tank. Too many drone battles
-Lacking the level of great boss battles from City and Origins

---