0 Users appreciate this thread.
carlos11 (2015-02-21 20:23:50)Oh no, not another cringey discussion full of kids trying to be special snowflakes.
I hate how you're all bastardizing INTJs everywhere. Especially me.
Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 20:27:04)Notice how last time this thread was created and nobody mentioned INTJs being supposedly "rare", not everyone was claiming to be an INTJ and most people here were INFP, which actually made a lot of sense.
carlos11 (2015-02-21 20:31:37)You can't ignore the fact that this is a lot more legit than
ing astrology. C'mon. Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 20:33:27)Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Judging. I'm pretty sure that's me. Don't worry, I'm not getting judgung confused with actually judging people like most people think. I also know that the feeling function is not the same as being emotional.
Also, to those who don't think this test is legit, over 40+ years of research is put into this and even though it's called a personality test, this actually only shows you... I gues you can say a piece of your overall personality.
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2015-02-21 20:34:47
Lani (2015-02-21 20:51:21)I wasn't really comparing the legitimacy of these tests to astrology, only that they have similar outcomes...Even if this test gave you the completely wrong result, you'd probably relate to it.
Sort of like this...
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2015-02-21 20:51:48
carlos11 (2015-02-21 20:54:01)Lani, no. why?
Why do you watch that?
Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
Lani (2015-02-21 20:56:06)That didn't give me my opinion. I've already had that opinion, and that video was only more of a vivid example.
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 20:56:18)@Lani
That makes sense. Especially since so many mbti results are similar to each other
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 20:58:04)@kishy
she was just using buzzfeed as an example. I wouldn't of chosen that source, but she isn't wrong
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2015-02-21 20:58:52
carlos11 (2015-02-21 20:59:37)Ok, Lani. Ok.
Don't do that again.
Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 21:02:23)I think if I would've read the INTP description first, I would've assumed I was an INTP. Same for INFP and ISTJ.
AntiChrist (2015-02-21 21:05:00)I know, but the first time I ever took the test I didn't know about the letters and what they meant. I was just focused on how curious I was about my weaknesses.
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2015-02-21 21:05:24
Log in to submit a comment
Back to forum: Miscellaneous
New registered users today: 0
Newest registered user: grumbler
The issue I have with these tests, is that I can read every personality type and relate to each one to some degree, similar to the Zodiac. We're too complex to label and cluster into a specific personality.
You might notice that none of these say anything like: "You're simple minded and not very smart. You're a follower who jumps on whatever band wagon sounds good to you rather than studying the theory yourself or developing a logical opinion of your own"...I think we all know of someone who fits that description. Not all personalities are good like this system claims them to be...and sure, there's probably redeemable qualities in everyone, but personality is certainly what gives a first impression.