Username:
Password:
Remember me:
Register

Back to forum: Miscellaneous


Search forums via Google


0 Users appreciate this thread.

Interesting question...
 >  >>
Started by OtherSilhouette
(2014-04-20 19:36:03)
OtherSilhouette (2014-04-20 19:36:03)
Hey all. I have a question that i'd like to ask your opinion on. Here it goes:

Lets say a person killed some people that were absolutely harmless and overall just normal people. However, the person who killed them stopped killing. Its been a while since it happened, and another person has a chance to kill the murderer. If the person kills said murderer, is it justice, or are they equally as bad?


Perfect_Chaos (2014-04-20 19:40:33)
Bad, because it would be better to have them arrested.
TREEhugger101 (2014-04-20 19:42:04)
It is not justice nor is it justifiable.
If you murder a murderer, you are no better than them.
It's like saying "This kid killed my mom on accident so now I'll murder his family." Then trying to say that you're innocent because said kid accidentally killed your mom.
It disgusts me how people think that killing a murderer is okay.

Jason2k14 (2014-04-20 19:52:30)
They're both equally as bad. No way it can be justice if you're murdering a murderer. Even though that murderer stopped killing for awhile, and the murderer who killed a victim's family member attacks them back for revenge, it stills makes them no better.
[IMG]http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140419205455/dragonball/pt-br/images/9/98/CELL_VS_SON_GOHAN.png[/IMG]
AngelRibbons (2014-04-20 19:57:42)
Killing others in general is really bad. Anybody who kills isn't showing ANY kind of justice whatsoever, and it doesn't matter who they're killing.
OtherSilhouette (2014-04-21 02:35:52)
Spoiler: show
This question is based off Supernatural, but keep discussing ouo

carlos11 (2014-04-21 02:44:19)
I don't know what Supernatural is but murder is never justifiable.
Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
Draazen (2014-04-21 05:44:52)
Eye for a eye. Blood for Blood. The muderer should die.

This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:
2014-04-22 03:09:55

AntiChrist (2014-04-21 10:14:46)
^ look at this dude trying to sound cool. I don't think that emoticon is helping.
Bean (2014-04-21 12:19:25)
^This
~~~
Lani (2014-04-21 12:22:09)
The murderer should have a trial and be executed...however a "common person" doesn't/shouldn't have the authority to do that, themselves.
3DLuigiMario (2014-04-21 23:32:27)
The only time it's acceptable is if the murderer tries to kill YOU
Lord Dimmy!
[IMG]http://a.deviantart.net/avatars/a/t/aticum.gif?8[/IMG]Dimentio (2014-07-10 09:59:14)

I'm the smart one~
TREEhugger101 (2014-04-22 00:30:07)
^

Draazen is pretty jerkish and annoying tbh

Mametchi (2014-04-22 21:10:57)
It's best to just try to be as self-defendant as possible using blunt objects if the said-murderer tries to murder you.
[simg][/simg]
SuperLuigiGuy (2014-04-24 02:49:42)
What if the killer kills the cops and some other cops kill them for the many deaths of cops...
I wanna die
 >  >>

Log in to submit a comment

This topic's ID: 69238

Back to forum: Miscellaneous




Total registered users: 8337
New registered users today: 0
Newest registered user: MarioErmando

©  Copyright 2026 3DSPlaza. All Rights Reserved