1 Users appreciate this thread.
HanShotFirst (2014-09-18 00:46:19)Nutsy, never use that sentence ever again. That is one of the worst arguments to use in a debate.
Taka! Kujata! Condor! Tajadol~!
little5 (2014-09-18 00:51:22)I am 100% okay with neutering/spaying.
I actually support it.
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2014-09-18 07:52:39
Nutsy (2014-09-18 00:52:21)Shh...
I honestly don't care for this debate. Neutering animals is only a big deal because there are so many people against it.
That's all it meant.
HanShotFirst (2014-09-18 00:58:55)To that I'd have to agree.
I will, however, stand firmly against Cat declawment. Removing their claws only provides some convinience for the owner, the cat actually suffers during and after their claws being removed.
Taka! Kujata! Condor! Tajadol~!
imawsome12 (2014-09-18 04:55:38)My kind of forum. Should I start a religion vs. scientific debate? How about are we alone!? Ooooh! My favorite: Is there a afterlife? Nope, heres my favorite one!!! Is it really worth my time to start any of these, because is there anyone to give some good intellectual insight on any of these subjects?
Hi.
imawsome12 (2014-09-18 04:58:28)Well, anyway, when debating, bring in some facts defending your point. If you have morals, bring them in, BUT ONLY IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE ON WHY THEY ARE GOOD. Don't throw the religous ball either. keep it legit, lets not start a religion flame war. When i posted that, i was joking. (as in my previous post. not this one.)
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2014-09-18 11:59:05
Hi.
HanShotFirst (2014-09-18 10:55:56)>debating science vs religion
>ignoring the fact that the two are non-comparable structures
>ignoring that some of science is based on postulates
>appeal to morality is a logical fallacy, as it's argument is based solely on the premise that their conclusion is the most moral/ethical simply by being in line with their own morals/ethics.
This post has been edited one or more times, the last time was:2014-09-18 17:56:59
Taka! Kujata! Condor! Tajadol~!
Jason2k14 (2014-09-18 11:01:02)"My kind of forum" "Religion vs science"
I think you mean a thread. Can someone explain to me why you people like cats more than dogs?
They need respect too.
Know what I'm sayin'?
[IMG]http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140419205455/dragonball/pt-br/images/9/98/CELL_VS_SON_GOHAN.png[/IMG]
carlos11 (2014-09-18 11:59:24)Some idiot at school "chose" to become a mormon. No member of her family is mormon, she simply chose to believe. Discuss.
Language is a tool for efficient communication. The internet is a tool for fast communication. Do not defy both intents by posting incoherent writing.
Nutsy (2014-09-18 12:02:17)If she's a bandwagoner, she'd better shape up. If she was invited by a friend, it's okay.
She'll still need her parents' permission to get baptized, though.
HanShotFirst (2014-09-18 22:02:15)I prefer cats as they have lower maintenance overall and because they're completely chill.
I will however, admit to owning Dogs as they're complete bros. If you put the effort into properly training and maintaining your dog's health, it's glorious.
Rats and Ferrets make better pets than both.
Taka! Kujata! Condor! Tajadol~!
Log in to submit a comment
Back to forum: Miscellaneous
New registered users today: 0
Newest registered user: Kris
Thing is, morality is subjective. It's based on how each individual feels on the topic and whether or not they consider something good or bad.
When your feelings are all you bring into a debate, and nothing factual, then your argument is an appeal to emotion/morality, which is a logical fallacy.